countdown

(the player who play on the 0 wins)

200

spam

What means "play on the 0"? Did I miss something?

I guess the player who writes 0. But in case of kpato you never know :D

I tink kpato tries to invent some "new" game. Every post must count down to zero, the one who writes the "0" message wins. Every one who post a message in the wrong order is disqualified. You get it? :)))))))))))

I think everyone got it. They are just thinking about strategy now.

yes

Eduard is right.

i forgot something

nobody can post 2 times consecutive

199

Well, this is slightly less annoying than having the Javascript thing always be on top.

198

kpato, you broke the only rule then.

Why would anyone want to play "1"? Since he's not allowed to play two times in a row, he can't win, so no-one will play 1. The game has a serious flaw, kpato.

I think what Ondik meant to post was that Kpato broke the only rule and must be disqualified.

197

I understood that, Robert. I mean that the game is flawed. It will never end, as no-one will ever play "1", since that means he can't win the game.

I think what you meant to say Mariusz was:

"I understood that, Robert. I mean that the game is flawed. It will never end, as no-one will ever play "1", since that means he can't win the game. 196"

No, I didn't. I do not intend to participate in the actual game, thus I did not submit a number :-)

199

Well then, Marius, I'm sorry to say that we'll have to unleash Kpato on you (you saw what he did to Player 2) and since I don't know what number we're on now I'll just label this post n - 1

I'll just skip to 42.

195

PD: ondik , you are right!! in the first move

i broke the only one rule! wjajja

i was showing u how to play...:$

PD2: the game is going to have a winner...im sure about that

PD3: dont stop the game...lets going down

if someone have an idea...share with us

you are empowering the need of two nicks per person ;P

194

Gregorio, good idea! 193

192

191

190

189

188

187

186

and I always thought that littlegolem was a place full of intelligent people...

185

184

Au, més gent amb poca feina...

183

Folks... I still miss a valid 198... William's 198 wasn't valid, because kpato's 199 was illegal. 198

I think kpato realized 200 was too high and started a new countdown from 199.

182

Is there a rule to not miss a number? I refer to William's 42 and post

37

( This also solves the "no one will post 1" problem ;)

Just in case...

0

[181]

tasuki

check my other thread

"counting"

take a look to the beauty of the simple

I have a thought that might solve the "1" problem. You may post twice in a row, but not more than that. I haven't thought it through yet so there might be a flaw with that, too. Reminds me of Nim.

180

Then nobody will post 2. :-) Except those with two nicks, like me, of course.

179

178

177

176

This thread is well on the way to becoming the most important topic ever.

IN CAPITAL LETTERS, even : CLXXV

CLXXIV

But there's no zero in roman numbers...

173

(i like the idea of johnxcrowe)