#1 · Hjallti
1 Jun 2011
I actually still don't understand what the concept of 'team' means on this site. Can someone explain from scratch?
Public forum discussion.
1 Jun 2011
I actually still don't understand what the concept of 'team' means on this site. Can someone explain from scratch?
1 Jun 2011
Its quite simple: for each game with at least 5 teams a team championship is played. This championship works exactly like individual championship, except, that its the teams which face each other in each championship league. For now, only StreetSoccer and EinStein würfelt nicht! started its team championships and they both only have one league (for now).
In each team x team face-off eight games are played (four with 'white' and four with 'black'). If a team has exactly eight players, each player play one game against one player of the opposing team. If team has less than eight player, some of them will play more than one game against each opposing team. If the team has more than eight players, some of them (the lower rated when face-off starts) won't be playing at all.
If you want to join a EWN team, you'd be most welcomed in my Sobral1919. Just send me a message and I'll invite you (you wouldn't be playing 1st championship, as it has already started).
1 Jun 2011
does that invite count for me too?
1 Jun 2011
Of course, anyone is welcome in any of my teams, at least until they misbehave. Just send me a message telling which (if any) of my teams you want to join.
4 Jun 2011
I have a question on team tournaments.
For the final ranking, what is more important:
number of points or score?
Let's assume a fictive result:
"Waldorf and his bot(s)" vs "EinStein Italia" 3:5
Does this mean (from Waldorfs view): 0:2 points and 3:5 score?
Another fictive example:
"Waldorf and his bot(s)" vs "EinStein Italia" 4:4
Does this mean (from Waldorfs view): 1:1 points and 4:4 score?
Thx in advance for enlightening.
Ingo alias Waldorf (Statler might know the answer, but currently
he is not in the balcony)
6 Jun 2011
Currently there is still potential for improvement
in the LG information in team matches.
Look for instance at
There you read
"Team match: Serendipity vs. Waldorf and his Bots null : null ",
although team Waldorf has won already two of the eight matches.
A more helpful line might be
"Team match: Serendipity vs. Waldorf and his Bots 0:4 - six games pending "
Ingo.
6 Jun 2011
Hello Richard,
good service.
Thank you, Ingo.
6 Jun 2011
My team is going to killme for that.
6 Jun 2011
> My team is going to killme for that.
Hi Kpato,
at most symbolically. In real life there
is no danger. We are a peaceful community
on a peaceful server.
Shalom, Ingo
6 Jun 2011
Don't worry kpato. I'm considering committing suicide before my team find my awful results.
7 Jun 2011
No worries, kpato. We ain't gonna kill you. We'll just force you into smoking a few cigarettes.
7 Jun 2011
Jes, ten cigarettes. (We're just deciding the 10 brands.)
7 Jun 2011
Duke, shame on you:
you are a direct opponent of kpato (in EWN).
Waldorf
7 Jun 2011
Ingo, I have exactly 341 opponents, in this moment!
7 Jun 2011
341 opponents or 341 games?
7 Jun 2011
341 games. I don't know how many opponents. Anyway.
9 Jun 2011
Richard has introduced a new feature for the sites
of team tournaments. Now, directly below the
tournament table, the top ten list of performers
is given.
Thanks, Richard! Ingo.
9 Jun 2011
If he also includes the worst 10, my name will pop in!
10 Jun 2011
If it ranked players by points won minus points lost, I think it would be better for tournaments in progress. My perfect score in one game doesn't mean nearly as much as JJ10's 8-3 record (16 points in 11 games).
11 Jun 2011
Or another proposal:
Make the top ten list by ratios (like now), but
include only players who have finished at least
3 or 4 games.
Ingo.