Little Golem#1 · YHW
4 May 2011
Hi,
I have constantly monitored the games of the best 50 players in the last year . The idea was a kind of an all-time tournament in which all games of the best 50 against each other has to be considered in order to encourage more people to play against other players, because 4 players in the current top 10 are inactive or other players with a high number of points have only played not more than 100 matches.
The yearly championship seems inappropriate to determine the "best player" because the influense of luck is too high in a single tournament. So that I wanted to monitor all games of the players to get a better estimation.
My stats are including all winning quotes against each other. If you would be interested to take a look on it, please send me a message with your e-mail adress. you would need a current Excel version to view the stats.
After analyzing the stats, the winning quotes of the most players are different but relative close to each other except of 2 signifcant steps between 'the bots' and the 'best players' as well as between the best and the rest - the 'better players'.
It seems so that hanfried_c is really the best bot/player followed by Roro.
The next 'league is given by naive_child_c, Telestes, MarleysGhost, kitaktus, luiser, wurscht, hubbie_c.
While taking the fact into account that the most players in this 'league' are inactive, it is only represented by naive_child_c, kitaktus. So that kitaktus should really be the best active human player.
All other players are in a 'lower league'.
Another but similar rating arisis while using a point system to determine the 'best player' due to the current winning quotes of a specific player against another one in the top 50. According to the points in a tournament, the player get 2 points while the quote against another player is higher than 50% and 0 points if the quote is lower than 50%. The fact that 2 players haven't played against each other and/or the quote is equal (50%) is considered by 1 point.
Roro would reach the averaged points of 1.77 against all players in the top 50 followed by hanfried (1.65 points). So that Roro should be the winner of an all time tournament if the tournament should be finished ever.
Currently, while summarizing all reached points RoRo is in front because that unbelievable number of played games (hanfried gets 1 point for all players that it hasn't played), the 2nd best player would be luiser. Followed by YHW, hanfried_c, John-Marc 'Johnny' McGregor, FatPhil, ypercube, Pawel Grabowski, TUMRAK, Bernhard Herwig, Jonny, opmp, Ray Garrison, kitaktus, ...active players are advantaged while using such a point sytem.
As I saif, if you would be interested in your stats, send me a message. Included are the following players:
hanfried_c
MarleysGhost
Telestes
wurscht
naive_child_c
RoRoRo the Bot
hubbie_c
luiser
kitaktus
YHW
idiot
ypercube
opmp
Eiko Bleicher
Ray Garrison
LeCanardfou
Henrik Sjøl
Jonny
JJ10
Bernhard Herwig
Richard Pijl
kfiecio
FatPhil
Figilano
Dvd Avins
TUMRAK
Pawel Grabowski
Andreas Bleck
Rob
John-Marc 'Johnny' McGregor
Disciple
Tore S
zwack
Manou
Hartmut
Hjallti
fhsIV
Nagy Fathy
Jaakko Pirinen
vic
richyfourtytwo
Looser
Mojmir Hanes
klaashaas
Carroll
wojtex
graff
DukeOfPrunes
Dom
Ralf
Martin Horatschek
duvelman
Luca Bruzzi
bachkiesel
Micco
antony
duplolas
Matteo A.
Diamante
Ragnar Wikman
George
Aganju
kp4to
BigChicken
FCGerard'91
rafi
funtobewith11
conillet
neptun
Charles
VinceS
grozan