I'm cataloging a lot of edge templates I've found by seeing them a lot of times in my games, and by reviewing games by strong players and play a kind of "next move" game ;) Some of them are to be found in David King's page.
My question is, what do you think about naming them? I don't really like the naming in Browne's book (also used in hexwiki), but what's the popular thought about that naming policy?
I think a new naming system is not a bad idea. However, you should know that having a large collection of templates is not the best way to improve at Hex. I don't really have many templates memorized - I usually re-derive most of them as I need them. There are also some important connection patterns that don't necessarily qualify as templates:
I'm still shocked for that winning for White. And still haven't found the answer. THAT is a cool problem :D
Thanks a lot, Shalev. And please, people, don't spoil the fun ;) I'm still trying, hehehehe (that was not meant for you, Arek.... as long as it's link, I'm free to click on them or not, hehe)
Carroll, e2 is not the intended first move. It might still work, I didn't check, but there's a much simpler solution. Here's the intended solution: SPOILER