Several years ago it was almost exactly one week between the finish of the last game in one championship round and the start of the next round, but then this was cut down. I think people should have noticed this already, and if they played in the round before, they don't need to register for next one anyway; only if they have actively signed off the championship in between.
The problem with the full list is it contains player who don't play the game for a long time ago. Maciej doesn't play 5 years ago, may be. The short list is better for that i think.
Yes I agree, the short list would be a better comparison if I want to complain about lack of attendance. Gyorgy, Thierry, and Alan might never play here again, for example. I was merely comparing my notion of an ideal tournament to the reality. There's just too much focus on living and stuff like that.
Let me, then, be the FIRST to congratulate Sam D for his championship victory! Finishing with only one loss - everyone else has at least two - seals it. Sam's been here a while, quietly (?) blowing away his opposition, so getting his name on the board of champions is well deserved. WELL DONE!!note that I just played through the moves of his win over Steven, another excellent player for sure, and I can not fathom a thing!! That's just my limitation, but I certainly won't mind reading through a few game notes.This was NOT a 'weak' championship! I don't care what some earlier threads opined; everyone here deserved to be here, and I look forward to seeing their games and results in future tournaments!(meow)
truncation??! "note that I just played through the moves of the game between Sam and Steven, both excellent players in my mind", or some such. Don't know why clipped out.(m)
what I meant to say in the clipped out portion is that I found the game between Steven and Sam unfathomable; that's my limitation, but is why I would happily read some posted analysis. meowie!