#1 · David J Bush
27 Sep 2026
Public forum discussion.
27 Sep 2026
27 Sep 2026
That's a very good point, especially about the opening and swap decision. The current model was trained on the full-size board, and the smaller boards are adapted from it rather than independently trained. Local tactical patterns seem to transfer reasonably well, but I agree that opening values and swap decisions may not scale in the same way because the link geometry itself does not scale with the board.
I'm actually planning to run a small 16x16-specific training experiment, so this gives me a very useful test case.
Peyrol's five-minute move time is probably a separate issue, though. Master taking a few seconds is much closer to what I normally expect, so I'd also like to find out which backend his browser is using and whether it is falling back to CPU.
27 Sep 2026
My PC is old and tiny. I don't even have a slot for a GPU. I use Firefox under Linux Mint. If you email me what you want, I can send you files and console output.
27 Sep 2026
Thanks — that explains the very long thinking time quite well. On an older PC without a GPU, the AI may simply be running entirely on the CPU, so several minutes per move is plausible.
That may be separate from the playing-strength issue, though. Alan is seeing fairly weak play on the small board even on an iPhone where the AI runs quickly, so I want to investigate the small-board adaptation independently.
I may take you up on your offer and ask for a small amount of browser console output and system information. That would help me confirm which backend Route 5 is actually using on your machine.
28 Sep 2026
I sent you an email.